Progess On Nuclear Weapons Reductions This Week In Paris And Geneva

Atomic bombs may become obsolete, if recent developments are anything to go by. It has been a long time without much good news on this front (the U.S. infamously withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty in 2001) but suddenly, through a lot of diplomatic efforts, including by Japan, there is hope for progress.

American and Russian negotiators reached an "agreement in principle" on the first nuclear-arms-reduction treaty in nearly two decades, administration and arms-control officials said on February 3, according to The Wall Street Journal:

The deal would bring the ceiling for deployed nuclear weapons down to between 1,500 and 1,675 per side, from the 2,200 agreed to in 1991, but nuclear-delivery systems would fall more sharply, to between 700 and 800 each from the current limit of 1,600. In fact, both sides have already reduced their nuclear-armed bombers, submarines and missiles to below 1,000.

Daryl Kimball, executive director of the Arms Control Association, a Washington-based advocacy group, said the agreement is a milestone, the first arms-control treaty to not only set goals on warhead deployments but also to establish strict limits, with verification measures to hold each side to those limits.

Then, the Paris-based conference called Global Zero concluded their conference in Paris with strong support for the elimination of all nuclear weapons. A large number of senior Japanese politicians and diplomats are voicing their support for this effort, together with statesmen and -women including Jimmy Carter, Mikhail Gorbachev, Desmond Tutu, Hans Blix, Mary Robinson, and Gro Harlem Brundtland. Full list of signatories here.

In December 2008 in Paris—in response to the growing threats of proliferation and nuclear terrorism—100 leaders from around the world launched Global Zero. They announced a plan for the phased, verified elimination of nuclear weapons, starting with deep reductions in the U.S. and Russian arsenals, to be followed by multilateral negotiations among all nuclear powers for an agreement to eliminate all nuclear weapons—global zero. The growing group includes former heads of state, former foreign ministers, former defense ministers, former national security advisors, and more than 20 former top military commanders.

Presidents Obama's and Medvedev's commitment to a world free of nuclear weapons - matched by growing support from governments around the world—represents an historic opportunity to stop proliferation and end the nuclear threat once and for all by setting the world on the course to the elimination of all nuclear weapons.

Global Zero is working on three fronts to achieve this goal: 1) developing a step-by-step plan for the elimination of nuclear weapons based on the Paris conference framework; 2) conducting track-two diplomacy to build support among key governments; and 3) generating broad-based worldwide public support through media and online communications and grassroots organizing.

Today, February 5, NHK World notes:

Experts on nuclear disarmament have proposed that Russia and the United States dramatically cut the number of nuclear weapons and called for boosting the movement for nuclear nonproliferation. A 3-day conference organized by the group "Global Zero" concluded in Paris on Thursday with about 200 experts and former high-ranking officials from all over the world in attendance. A declaration crafted by the conference says both Russia and the United States must reduce their nuclear arsenals to 1,000 respectively and other nuclear powers must not seek additional nuclear deployments.

You can sign the Global Zero Declaration here, and help spread the word. I can think of no better way to start the new year - and the decade - than to have such a strong push for nuclear disarmament.

However, let's also remember that U.S. president Obama has just approved an increase in funding of some $ 5 billion, or more than 13 percent, for the National Nuclear Security Administration that oversees the U.S. nuclear weapons complex. They will get $11.2 billion from tax payers if the increase is approved by Congress. The Washington Post has more:

In addition, the budget request provides for a 10.4 percent increase, to $1.6 billion, in funds for additional work in science and technology to enhance confidence in the annual certification of the nuclear stockpile. An additional $2 billion would go to the long-term program to upgrade weapons-complex facilities, including a new plutonium facility for the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico and a uranium manufacturing plant at Oak Ridge, Tenn.

In September 2009, the UN Security Council Summit adopted a resolution aimed at achieving "a world without nuclear weapons." In this resolution a provision was included which urges all nations to embrace an additional protocol developed by the IAEA for strengthening its inspection system. A strong appeal on the part of Japan was reportedly behind the move.

In the words of peace activist Kazumi Mizumoto at the Hiroshima Peace Institute, "this does not mean that Japan can simply sit idle and wait for nuclear weapons to be eliminated. If Japan desires a non-nuclear policy, the government must pursue a path of security that does not rely on nuclear arms."

For another approach, here is the proposal of Regina Hagen, currently visiting Japan:

Many proposals have been made how to achieve a nuclear-weapon-free world. Ususally, such plans suggest individual measures -- the so-called incremental approach with steps such as entry into force of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, conclusion of a Fissile Materials (Cutoff) Treaty, further US-Russian reductions of strategic nuclear weapons, no-first-use doctrines, lowering of the alert status of nuclear arsenals, etc. -- as steps towards nuclear abolition.

A different approach has been taken in the Model Nuclear Weapons Convention, which was drafted by three international non-governmental organizations (IALANA, INESAP, and IPPNW) in 1997 and updated in 2007. The model treaty suggests an incremental-comprehensive framework that outlines a framework of measures that would be implemented in five phases over fifteen years. The Model Nuclear Weapons Convention has been introduced to the UN by Costa Rica and Malaysia (A/62/650) and was referred to by the UN General-Secretary when he suggested that as a measure leading to nuclear disarmament states “could consider negotiating a nuclear-weapons convention, backed by a strong system of verification, as has long been proposed at the United Nations” (Ban Ki-moon, October 24, 2008).

In her talk, Regina Hagen explained the main provisions of the Model Nuclear Weapons Convention and described the advantages of such an approach as compared to the current nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament regime. Regina Hagen, Michio Kaku, Agneta Norberg, Robert Anderson, Bruce Gagnon and a lot of other good people at the board of the Global Network are thinking deeply about these issues. Do listen.

Read more!


Tom O said…
We HAVE come a long way with this issue. Once upon a time things were different and for those of a certain age - and we're not talking oji-san here - the threat was very real and 'nuclear proliferation' just that. A real Damocles sword if one thought about too much. One will realise that if an attack from the Soviet Union had been launched the US would not have been the first target. Across the Pond...

Check out the 'Cultural Impact'.
(I'm sure that wasn't a pun!)

Of course now the threats that exist are different, as one door closes another opens. In the late 80s, when that threat was real, I visited NYC and of course visited the World Trade Center. Can't say I've looked at the photos for quite a few years now...

Still, it is real progress - if a '1,000 each' is that! Why not just none! And of course when Iran is being pressed, shall we say, to not produce any.

And I do think that its an amazing achievement that there have been no nuclear incidents since 1945. One wonders about the REALLY close calls in the interim - we don't and will never know about. Thank God, literally.
Martin J Frid said…
Thanks Tom, great comment. For those of a certain age, it is all too real. We grew up with it, not having asked for it. "Cultural impact" or how about "Psychological..."
Tom O said…
This was the President of the US at the time, making a 'joke'...

As one of the comments says, unfortunately believable at the time. We're not 'joking'.
Hi Tom,

It is a miracle that nations have not entered nuclear war and wiped out the entire planet yet--especially with the Doomsday thinkers that worked at Rand and now with the fundamentalist Armageddon thinkers at top posts in other think tanks, the US govt and military.

It's also amazing that atomic bombs have been used so many times -- but because these uses were considered "tests," the horror that should be felt worldwide is not there.

The US govt. is always talking about the possibility of nuclear terrorism, but doesn't mention that the US govt. has already used nuclear weapons against 300,000 American young men who were atomic test soldiers on US territory (mostly in Nevada). And of course Americans in the area were inadvertent test subjects. Fall-out from these 1,000 covered the entire United States.

The US has already nuclear-bombed the Marshall Islands.

The USSR bombed itself (in Kazakhstan, Turkemistnan and the Ukraine) over 700 times.

France has nuclear bombed Polynesia and Algeria over 200 times.

The UK has nuclear bombed Australia 45 times.

China has nuclear bombed itself in the historic Tarim Basin 45 times.

India and Pakistan have both bombed themselves.

This is incredibly pathological social psychology on behalf of the world's nation-states that have already attacked and terrorized their own citizens and their "colonies" repeatedly with nuclear weapons "tests" (fully knowing the effects of radiation and fall-out) over 2,000 times.

I read in a newspaper story that US govt. told ranchers in the Nevada/Colorada/New Mexico area whose cows hair fell out completely they had no idea what caused it. Then the children in the area began to die of leukemia.

Hibakusha are not just Japanese -- but include millions of people who were victims of nuclear bombing "tests," their descendants, the "downwinders" (which now is almost everyone in the world), those worked in the nuclear military industrial complex and their descendants. I wish more of their stories could be shared.

Because of quality control and other issues, there have been close calls with nulcear weapons (not just because of hot politics). There's still a lost nuclear bomb off the Savannah, Georgia coast.

I think we are all Hibakusha and just haven't awakened to the realization because of the psychological terrorism we have endured and at least some level of exposure to radiation from nuclear bombings worldwide (even if they were "tests").

Martin J Frid said…
Thanks Jean, that is a powerful comment with a lot of truth in it. I wish this is what all kids were taught in school - talk about truth in textbooks.

Popular posts from this blog

TPP Documents Leaked, Huffington Post, Activists Huff

World Social Forum Arakawa, Tokyo

Salvador Dali, Hiroshima and Okinawa